Which burn depth is described as pink hemorrhagic markings that involve the epidermis and dermis, are moist and painful?

Which burn depth is described as pink hemorrhagic markings that involve the epidermis and dermis, are moist and painful?

• A. First-degree burn
• B. Deep second-degree burn
• C. Superficial second-degree burn
• D. Full-thickness burn

Answer: (B)

Burn depth is judged by which skin layers are damaged and how the skin looks and feels. When the epidermis and dermis are both involved, you’re dealing with a second-degree burn. The pink color with hemorrhagic markings points to injury extending into the deeper dermal layer, not just the superficial part. The tissue being moist and painful fits partial-thickness injury because nerve endings in the dermis are still active. First-degree burns involve only the epidermis and lack blisters. Full-thickness burns destroy the entire dermis, are usually dry or leathery, and are often not painful due to nerve destruction. So the described pattern best matches a deep second-degree burn, a deeper partial-thickness injury with ongoing pain and deeper dermal involvement.

Burn depth is judged by which skin layers are damaged and how the skin looks and feels. When the epidermis and dermis are both involved, you’re dealing with a second-degree burn. The pink color with hemorrhagic markings points to injury extending into the deeper dermal layer, not just the superficial part. The tissue being moist and painful fits partial-thickness injury because nerve endings in the dermis are still active. First-degree burns involve only the epidermis and lack blisters. Full-thickness burns destroy the entire dermis, are usually dry or leathery, and are often not painful due to nerve destruction. So the described pattern best matches a deep second-degree burn, a deeper partial-thickness injury with ongoing pain and deeper dermal involvement.